caenanalysis

  • Home
  • About me
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Coursework
  • A-Level Media blog
It's come to my attention that two out of three of my weekly news articles are somehow related to sex. I don't know what this says about me, and I'm truly sorry to anyone I may have shocked or offended in the process.

This article from BBC Three (a decidedly less biased BBC source targeted at a younger, far less Labour-phobic audience) detailed a scientific breakthrough of a male contraceptive injection currently in development. Although currently it has only been tested on rabbits, it is reported to have a >99% success rate, and seems to have no unwanted hormonal side effects that are a problem for many women on contraception (headaches, mood swings and weight gain). It's also easily reversible, as another injection can dissolve the polymer in the first allowing the sperm to be released again. 

(I'm so glad that this was the extent of science terminology in this article. I don't think I could cope with anything more complex.)

The author of this article, Josh Pappenheim, is a freelance writer who has worked for other companies such as MTV and Comedy Central, and seems to specialise in works dedicated to a younger audience. He achieves this, and gets their attention from the word go, using silly puns (such as the elegantly worded '[men] getting a prick in their prick') and mild taboo language ('little buggers' in relation to sperm) to make the audience feel included and like the writer is 'on their level', rather than talking down to them or including information far above their level of understanding. References to social media sites and platforms (Pappenheim references an online forum called Reddit in the article) also invite the interest of a wider audience by appealing to their interests.

The article itself got my attention on Facebook, using an entertaining image of condoms swimming like sperm towards a balloon in order to catch potential readers off-guard. (It worked, didn't it? I'm writing about the article now). Unlike many scientific articles, it made me laugh, and though Pappenheim's left-wing views are clearly expressed throughout the piece it included enough information to make a sound argument both for and against the marketing of a male 'pill' (that's actually an injection. But oh well).   

0
Share


On the rare occasion that Barrington wasn't in for our lesson, we found ourselves sat in front of Apple Macs (courtesy of Graham. Hi, Graham!) with the simple task: 'What is a thriller?'. Turns out that's not as simple an answer as we thought. Together, Adam and I worked together on a presentation detailing the conventions of a thriller. He did a lot of the research, I made it pretty. And here it is!




0
Share

This article piqued my interest as I was scrolling through The Independent's website. Whether on paper or online, The Independent have always prided themselves on being, well, completely politically independent (clue's in the name). The reporter, Andrew Griffin, a self-dubbed 'tech newsperson', reflects the news corporation's unbiased views by simply giving us an informative piece without any trace of personal opinion.

Microsoft have claimed that within 10 years they will find the secret to 'solving' cancer by treating it like a computer virus. The company have already developed a 'biological computation' unit which aims to make cells into programmable computers which can be adapted to solve medical problems such as cancer. They also say that while the vast amount of published research on cancer treatment would take a doctor years to read up on, computers could solve the problem by searching through digital copies to find the relevant information in a matter of minutes.

The digital world is evolving ever-quicker as time goes on. From watches that can track your location and send texts to self-driving cars, companies all over the world are cashing in with technological advances. Although much research has been done into the treatment and potential cures for cancer, our current methods of treating the disease are relatively primitive compared to Microsoft's proposed innovations. As much as I am terrified of a world run entirely on technology (implantable tech is my greatest fear), digital advances into the treatment of such devastating diseases that have plagued people since the dawn of time will prove invaluable if they can be achieved.
1
Share

This Girl Can (2015) is a campaign by Sport England, the body that allocates public funding to sport, as a way to encourage women of all shapes and sizes to get into sports and activities around the UK. Their official website states describes the campaign:
It’s a celebration of active women up and down the country who are doing their thing no matter how well they do it, how they look or even how red their face gets.
 It's inspirational, it's motivational, and more importantly it represents a diverse selection of women, and does not discriminate against any group, whether that be race, age or weight.

The Victoria's Secret swimsuit showcase (2015) is promotional material for the company, showcasing new release swimwear. They describe their brand:
The world's best bras. The sexiest lingerie. The most beautiful supermodels.
The company is the largest American retailer of women's lingerie, with 2012 sales of $6.12 billion, and attracts women of a particular demographic.


The promotional video for 'This Girl Can' begins with a shot following a woman in her bikini on her walk to the swimming pool. You do not see her face, or her identity at all; this is often a convention of male-centric advertising, which focuses more on women's sex appeal than women as people. However, this convention is quickly subverted as we are shown a shot of the woman adjusting her bikini bottoms, which portrays the woman as human (as almost every woman has had to straighten their bikini or underwear to reduce discomfort) and less like an object for male pleasure. The nonchalance and confidence with which she does this only adds to the normality of the situation, and suggests that she is perhaps unaware that the video is being shot, therefore is not putting an act on for the cameras.

The Victoria's Secret video also showcases a range of women in their swimsuits, but in contrast to This Girl Can this video is carefully filmed to achieve the flawless image that the brand aims to broadcast. In the particular shot pictured, a woman is shown in her bikini as the water splashes around her. Although you see her face, she appears completely void of all emotion, pouting and looking away from the camera. Her hair is perfectly tousled despite being in the water, and this is obviously constructed by the directors of the video as in reality any woman who has been in the water would have messy, tangled hair and running mascara - this woman's make-up is perfect due to the directors wanting to promote an 'ideal image' of women.


Another way these two videos present women in different ways is through their use of colour and light. The 'This Girl Can' video is colourful and vibrant, using rich colours such as the blue in the background of the pictured image to connote the excitement and passion that these women have for their sports. Certain shots are busy and crowded, with lots of focal points, flashing lights and colours; rather than being distracting or an indication of poor filming, these shots have been carefully constructed to show a flurry of colours and activity associated with active sports such as zumba classes and netball. In contrast, the Victoria's Secret video is particularly bland, with most shots featuring neutral colours like the sand and rock in the pictured image. Rather than presenting women as active, in this video the women are passive, with the neutral colours connoting stillness and calm. The use of  light is particularly strategic, drawing the audience's focus to the curves of the women's bodies. Paired with the women's sensual poses, this presents an air of sexuality and suggestivity, with these women seeming little more than objects on display.


***

The purpose of the 'This Girl Can' video is to inspire women to pursue sports both for their health and their enjoyment. Sports are stereotypically 'male' interests, and women who enjoy playing sports are often labelled as 'tomboys' rather than just being regarded as women who play sports. This video subverts these stereotypes and instead presents women with long hair, makeup and painted-pink nails playing sports without compromising their femininity. By broadcasting this video, women across the country could be inspired and invigorated by the presentation of strong and empowered women.

The Victoria's Secret video was produced and broadcast for an entirely different reason. As a business rather than a campaign, their aim is to promote and advertise their products in order to maximise sales and therefore product. Slow, sensual shots in the video show off the designs and colours of the swimsuits, and the poses the models are shown in are suggestive and sexy enough that they appeal to both men and women - men want their girlfriends and wives to look as attractive as the models used in the videos, therefore will buy the swimsuits in an attempt to achieve that, while women want to dress to impress, and buy Victoria's Secret products to feel as attractive as the women wearing them. 
3
Share

Our assignment was to create a video about ourselves. It had to be between 40 and 60 seconds, and be completely unedited. As I detest hearing my voice recorded I decided to make a very crude flipbook instead - apologies for the frankly appalling camera work!
(The title is slightly inaccurate, I apologise. But I give myself credit for only being 7 seconds off!)






0
Share
   
This story made me angry. Really, really angry. 

For a little bit of background information, earlier this year Brock Turner, a former Stanford University swimmer, was caught sexually assaulting an unconscious woman behind a dumpster on the university campus. The case was taken to court and the men who witnessed the attack, two Swedish graduate students, testified for the victim. One of the students was 'crying so hard he couldn't speak' according to a letter that the victim wrote as part of her testimony. In response, Turner claimed that he was given full consent to sexually touch the victim, and she didn't object or struggle in any way. His father produced a statement which called for probation rather than time in prison due to the fact that he had already paid “a steep price for 20 minutes of action". Turner was sentenced to six months imprisonment, yet is only expected to serve three months due to 'positive character references' and the fact that imprisonment could ruin his chances in college.

This article, from a small reporting site based in the US, details Turner's new project: touring college campuses of America with his family to educate the public on the dangers of factors such as drinking too much, and behaving 'promiscuously'. The article scorns Turner's family for looking to monetise the crimes Brock committed by blaming his actions on having drunk too much alcohol. It also brings up the issue of 'victim blaming', a common practice in which when a woman is assaulted or raped, the questions she is asked are in the region of 'what were you wearing?' and 'why were you walking alone?', implying that she is to blame for the trauma she has endured due to her own actions.

The article, to me, perfectly sums up my own thoughts on the matter - I was furious when I first heard about the case, and as time progressed and Turner was sentenced my anger only grew. The article encompasses the unfortunate truth on the matter - that Turner's case was the norm, not an exception, and far too many sexual assault cases, even those that are reported, have no action taken against them because there was either too little evidence to make a legitimate case, or because the victim was reported to have been 'asking for it' in their actions. Regardless of what a woman is wearing, how much she has had to drink, or how much time she spends with you, unless she specifically consents to sex any advances towards her are unwanted and downright appalling, and unfortunately are not seen as such by far too many people in the Western world.
1
Share
Newer Posts Home

About Me

Caena.
Media, English and Sociology student.
I'm punny sometimes.
"Opinions are like assholes. Everybody's got one and everyone thinks everyone else's stinks."

Labels Cloud

  • a2
  • a2 coursework
  • analysis
  • assignment
  • bfi
  • film
  • news
  • representation of women
  • theory
  • thriller coursework

Blog Archive

  • ►  2018 (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2017 (9)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ▼  2016 (20)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ▼  September (6)
      • weekly news #3: the male pill is coming
      • thriller presentation
      • weekly news #2: solving cancer?
      • sweat vs sex appeal
      • 60 second video
      • weekly news #1: brock turner

Popular Posts

  • weekly news #14 - schoolgirl rescued after kidnap by boko haram
  • 05/10/17 - london film festival
  • weekly news #4 - logan paul makes me sick
Copyright © 2015 caenanalysis

Created By ThemeXpose | Distributed By Blogger Templates20